>AI Coding Tool Comparison

clawdboard tracks usage from 1 AI coding tool: Claude Code (Anthropic). Each tool's usage is tracked separately, allowing side-by-side comparison of cost, token usage, and model preferences.

Based on data from 26 developers, Claude Code leads with $21.7k in estimated API cost (100.0% of total spend). Popularity is measured by estimated cost, which reflects total usage volume weighted by model pricing.

The clawdboard CLI reads local log files from each supported tool on a developer's machine. Claude Code all maintain local usage logs. The CLI extracts token counts and model identifiers from these logs and syncs aggregate data to clawdboard. No code, prompts, or conversation content is collected.

Yes. If you use multiple supported tools, the clawdboard CLI will detect and sync usage from all installed tools. Your profile page shows a breakdown by tool, and the leaderboard aggregates your total spend across all tools.

All costs are estimated from token counts and published API pricing for each model. Usage is priced at the respective provider's rates (Anthropic, OpenAI, etc.). These are API-equivalent estimates — most developers pay flat subscription fees.

Individual developers sync their usage every 2 hours by default. The aggregate statistics on this page are recalculated hourly. New tools are added to tracking as they gain community adoption.